Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Surendrakumar, A.
- Performance Evaluation of Rotary and Flail Shredders
Abstract Views :258 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Farm Machinery and Power, Agricultural Engineering College and Research Institute (T.N.A.U.), Kumulur, Trichy (T.N.), IN
2 Agricultural Machinery and Research Centre (T.N.A.U.), Coimbatore (T.N.), IN
1 Department of Farm Machinery and Power, Agricultural Engineering College and Research Institute (T.N.A.U.), Kumulur, Trichy (T.N.), IN
2 Agricultural Machinery and Research Centre (T.N.A.U.), Coimbatore (T.N.), IN
Source
International Journal of Agricultural Engineering, Vol 11, No 1 (2018), Pagination: 23-29Abstract
A large portion of crop residues burnt in farming fields due to non-availability of labour and high cost of residue removal. Burning of crop residues causes environmental pollution as well as increase the loss of plant nutrients. Therefore, appropriate management of crop residues assumes a great significance. Shredders are widely used for shredding the crop residues into small pieces and their performance study is an important factor for wide scale adoption. The field experiments were carried out to evaluate the performance of shredders and estimate the operational cost. The performance of shredders in terms of field efficiency, shredding efficiency was investigated with respect to change in forward speed of operation viz., 2, 3 an 5 km h-1 and blade types viz., straight blade and flail blade with selected shredders. The experimental results revealed that increasing shredding efficiency by decreasing in forward speed of operation from 5 to 2 km h-1 with optimum peripheral velocity of rotary and flail shredders.Keywords
Shredding Efficiency, Field Efficiency, Forward Speed of Operation, Blade Type.
References
- Ahmed, R.A.A. and Dosoky, S.H.M. (2009). Performance evaluate on of a developed local sod mower. Misrj. Ag. Eng., 26 (4) : 1800-1812.
- Awady, M.N.,Ghoneim, E.Y. and Hashish, A.l . (1982 ).A critical comparison between wheat combine harvesters under Egyption conditions. Res. Bull. No. 1920. Ain Shams Univ.; 113pp.
- Baiomy, A.M. (1997). Design of shredder machine for cutting and colleting crop residues, Ph.D. Th., Fac. Ag. A. Shames U. pp.128-210.
- Bharambe, P.R., Tajuddin, A.H., Oza, S.R. and Shelke, D.K. (2002). Effect of irrigation and crop residue management on crop and soil productivity under soyabean sorghum cropping system. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 50 (3): 233-236.
- Cowlick, R.F., Jones, J.W. and Fulgham, F.E. (1971). Crop residues disposal-tillage-planting, Transaction of ASAE, 14 (1): 114-120.
- Eltarhuny, M. M. and Fouda, T. (2007). Utilization of self-propelled harvester and shredder machines for removing some field crop residues. Training High Institute, Farm Mechanisation Department, Libya.
- Guzel, E. and Zeren, Y. (1990). The theory of free cutting and its application on cotton stalk. Agricultural Mechanization in Asia, Africa and Latin America, 21: 55-56.
- Jain, N., Bhatia, A. and Pathak, H. (2014). Emission of air pollutants from crop residue burning in India. Centre for Environment Science and Climate Resilient Agriculture, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
- Kambis, A.D. and Levine, J.S. (1996). Biomass burning and the production of carbon dioxide: a numerical study. Chapter 17 In: Biomass burning and global change, Joel S. Levine (comp.) 1: 170-177, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA (US) .
- Kepner, R.A., Bainer, R. and Barger, E.L. (1972). Principle of farm machinery. 3rd Ed., Te AVI Pub. Co., U.S.A: 341- 357pp.
- Luis, F.C., Savage, G.M., Eggerth, L.L. and Clarence, G. G. (1993). Composting and recycling municipal solid waste. Lewis Pub.London. pp. 453-468.
- MNRE (Ministry of New and Renewable Energy Resources) (2009). Govt.of India, New Delhi. www.mnre.gov.in/biomassrsources.
- Morad and Fouda (2009). Energy and cost required for removing residues of some field crops using different implements Egypt. J. Appl. Sci., 24 (3): 390-405.
- O’Dogherty, M.J and Gale, G.E. (1991). Laboratory studies of the effect blade parameters and stem configuration on the dynamics of cutting grass. J. Agric. Engg. Res., 49 : 99-111.
- Pathak, H., Bhatia, A., Jain, N. and Aggarwal, P.K. (2010). Greenhouse gas emission and mitigation in Indian agriculture. A review, In: ING bulletins on regional assessment of reactive nitrogen, Bulletin No. 19 (Ed. Bijay-Singh), SCON-ING, New Delhi, 34 pp.
- Reinhardt, T., Otmar, R. and Castilla, C. (2001). Smoke impacts from agricultural burning in a rural Brazilian town. J. Air &Waste Mgmt. Assoc., 51 : 443-450.
- Roberge, M., Savoie, P. and Norris, E.R. (1998). Evaluation of a crop processor in a pull- type forage harvester. Transaction ASAE, 41 (4) : 967-972.
- Roberts, R. and Corkill, J. (1998). Grass seed field smoke and its impact on respiratory health. Environ. Health, 60 (10) : 10-15.
- Senthilkumar, T. , Manian, R. and Kathirvel, K. (2011). Effect of blade and operational parameters on shredding efficiency of an experimental cotton stalk shredder. Agricultural Mechanization In Asia, Africa & Latin America., 42 (3) : 9-13.
- Vagadia, V.R., Kathiria, R.K. and Savani, J.B. (2004).Design and development of agricultural wastes shredder a new concept. Paper presented at the 38 Annual convention of ISAE, held at College of agricultural Engineering and Technology, Dr. Balasaheb Sawant Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, Dapoli, Ratnagiri (M.S.) India, January, pp.16-18.